Suchomel, Vítězslav [2015] Komparace průběhů soudních procesů první Československé republiky ve světle zákona č. 50/1923 Sb. na ochranu republiky
Verfasserwerk
Medium
Computer File
Open Access 
Language
Author Suchomel, Vítězslav
Titel Komparace průběhů soudních procesů první Československé republiky ve světle zákona č. 50/1923 Sb. na ochranu republiky
Institution Masarykova univerzita, Filozofická fakulta, Historický ústav
Verlagsort Brno
Jahr
2015
Anzahl Seiten 92
Bemerkung
Master thesis
"The master thesis deals with a comparison of six selected trials with the representatives of prohibited associations from the period of the First Republic. These trials took place on the basis of the law no. 50 of 1923, as a protection of the Republic. It is about the trials, which were held between 1925 and 1934 against the representatives of the communist association of Čerkes, the hungarian associations Levente and the so called "Ébredö Magyar Egyselité", the fascist association Junák, the german association Jungsturm and another german association Volkssport. Due to the six comparative criteria, the thesis answers these questions: How the courts proceeded in maintaining the legality during the above mentioned trials? What were the agreements and differences in attitudes and interventions of judges and individual participants of the trials? What is the difference between the media and political responses of the individual trials? What are the agreements and differences in the attitudes of judges from the point of view of the multicultural composition of the defendants of the selected trials? Was it about the political trials with the signs of the court theatre similar to the political trials in 1950s in the communist Czechoslovakia?"
"The master thesis deals with a comparison of six selected trials with the representatives of prohibited associations from the period of the First Republic. These trials took place on the basis of the law no. 50 of 1923, as a protection of the Republic. It is about the trials, which were held between 1925 and 1934 against the representatives of the communist association of Čerkes, the hungarian associations Levente and the so called "Ébredö Magyar Egyselité", the fascist association Junák, the german association Jungsturm and another german association Volkssport. Due to the six comparative criteria, the thesis answers these questions: How the courts proceeded in maintaining the legality during the above mentioned trials? What were the agreements and differences in attitudes and interventions of judges and individual participants of the trials? What is the difference between the media and political responses of the individual trials? What are the agreements and differences in the attitudes of judges from the point of view of the multicultural composition of the defendants of the selected trials? Was it about the political trials with the signs of the court theatre similar to the political trials in 1950s in the communist Czechoslovakia?"
0